Most health systems have no real way to know. But one found a way. It splits its early out work between us and another agency, and compares both sets of results every year. This gives the health system a clear view of how two different early out approaches compare on the same accounts.
Our share of the work has been smaller, $57 million smaller to be exact, and we’ve still collected more money. The case study puts a dollar figure on what that split has cost the health system. If you’ve never run a side-by-side on your own early out program, that number makes a good case for considering it.
